| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I had a package that needed changes that would introduce a dependency
cycle with USE=test and I had to ask on IRC whether this was OK. Sam
told me not to worry about it and recommended that the devmanual
should note this.
So, add a paragraph that discourages dependency cycles but expresses
that cycles provoked by USE=test can usually be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Horodniceanu <a.horodniceanu@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The message in the code block is clearly a message from an eclass author to
ebuild developers and therefore should use eqawarn and not ewarn, like the
"QA warnings" passage above describes.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This replaces the code example with a snippet of how it is currently used in
::gentoo/dev-util/intel-ocl-sdk/intel-ocl-sdk-18.1.0.015.ebuild
because the old example code had multiple issues.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the code example after the text uses PV to show allowed conditional
inherits, the preceding text should also mention that PV is valid.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The mentioned versions are over 18 years old and the elog functionality has
become common. There is no value in stating when it was implemented. Removed
Paludis because it has no relevance for Gentoo. (unlike maybe for PMS)
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Those bash "here strings" were introduced 22 years ago and stating the version
they were implemented does not serve any purpose any more.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The devmanual commonly uses <c> to format variables in text passages as code
to make them more distinguishable from the rest of the text and that's why
it should be done here too.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The double if "if and only if" feels bumpy when reading, makes the reader
wonder if there is a deeper hidden meaning but serves no purpose, so
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"should be used as less as possible" is not a correct expression,
use "should be avoided" instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Engel <sighunter@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes no difference for the HMTL output, i.e. xsltproc will
expand <foo/> to <foo></foo>.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See GLEP 76 update:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/commit/?id=7f0ce454b2359ed742b84d1d60176fadad15c066
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in #gentoo-qa.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No longer mention eutils.eclass for eqawarn.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As it turns out, Portage will silently drop files containing an @ char
during Manifest generation.
See bug 411127 and bug 106544 for further reference.
This reverts commit 38de9c654dd036b304b158a32b14dbe785327938.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed in #gentoo-dev.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This agrees with the footer in other gentoo.org sites.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently these have been missed previously.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Internal links referring to sections were broken by the previous
"Sentence case devmanual" commit.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is referred to as the "Clean patch howto" from several other
places. The wording change would also break links because the section
title is used as fragment identifier.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Matthew Marchese <maffblaster@gentoo.org>
[Whitespace. Fix rebase artifact in ebuild-writing/functions/src_test.]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Louis Sautier <sbraz@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Historically we had some PDF files in the repository, but the last
of them was removed in 2011.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865455
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Suggested by mjo and sam.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
eclass-to-manpages is now less strict about placement of the tag.
This reverts commit cd392d0c6cd064ac3a1381111e678f4fe111afcc.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Drop explanation of epatch. Rework the eapply sections and add
additional examples.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update references throughout.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/927555
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make the rule forbidding reusing old package names less strict. There
is no real reason not to move packages back — we can safely assume
that the package manager will handle that just fine. The only real
restriction is that no other package must reuse any of the old names,
i.e. effectively cause the package manager to attempt merging
the packages together.
Add explicit rules for updating old package move entries. These match
the logic used in pkgcheck, and therefore ensure both correct results
and no warnings from pkgcheck.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
[Replace Unicode subscripts by <sub> markup]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org>
|